One personal invitation per client evaluation.
Professionals create a unique Evaluation invitation from MyProfile. Each link is one-time and bound to the professional identity and professional role selected for that engagement.
Work Being limits how far back new client evidence can be collected.
Evaluations may be requested for work that is ongoing or that ended during the current calendar year. A professional may also collect a limited number of evaluations for work completed in the immediately preceding calendar year.
This is a governance safeguard intended to keep evidence reasonably recent and reduce retrospective cherry-picking. It is not presented as a psychometric validity threshold.
The client confirms when the work took place.
The professional records whether the work is ongoing or, if completed, the month and year it ended. Before answering Evaluation questions, the client confirms or corrects that information.
This bilateral timing confirmation improves assurance but does not independently verify the respondent's legal identity. The professional cannot override a client correction after submission.
Aggregate evidence and private feedback have different boundaries.
With the required publication consent, a qualifying rating may contribute to the profile's aggregate Evaluation score and count. Private feedback, health information and other private respondent content are not automatically projected onto MyProfile.
Payment buys workflow capacity, not stronger evidence.
MyProfile includes five client evaluations. Continued Evaluation collection requires paid/Pro collection capacity once those included responses and active reservations are used.
What Evaluation does not prove.
- It does not certify that a professional is objectively better than another professional.
- It does not replace credential or licence verification.
- It does not establish treatment efficacy or clinical outcome.
- Invitations are professional-bound and one-time, but respondent identity is not independently verified in the current model.
- Invitation-based evidence is not assumed to be a representative sample of all clients.
- Timing confirmation reduces one source of uncertainty; it does not remove selection bias, recall bias, duplicate-client risk or collusion risk.